Want Review for my website

[sudarshannus]

I want reviews for my website.My website is pagereviews.uni.cc

[jon123]

You asked for a review so hope you take critisism and well as praise!

You have missing images and afraid for me, frames are outdated.

[harry]

It’s always better to start with your introduction as your first post...

You should also use NOFRAMES tag for your site so as to display some content for those people who are using non-frames-enabled browsers also the search engines which don't understand frames also look at the NOFRAMES tag.

[ouahabix]

I think the design seems something too classic, if no body look for a new date he would think that's an old site.

Try to implement some CSS and bright colors or just buy a pre-completed template from TemplateMonster , unfortunately the visitors give a big attention to design not the content except some!

Good Luck

[paul]

Yea, since you are going to review other sites for content, design, style etc so apparently it's logical that your site should levelheaded on that part.

[ouahabix]

Originally Posted by paul

Yea, since you are going to review other sites for content, design, style etc so apparently it's logical that your site should levelheaded on that part.

Take it easy PAUL , I said the most of the people but I exclude some, this is a real fact and why do you think a lot of sites are using shock waves and so on, I don't like that kind of stuff and I've mentioned that before as a disadvantage in yahoo mail!

And be real, people are not attracted by the content since thew know nothing about how does a site been built and its security, is it risk free from SQL injections or not! they judge you of your design!?

I like rent a coder,Gmail,SourceForge...etc and all of them has no design or flash pics except if it's an advertiser one and I do judge them about the content not the look.

Here I gave him an Advice not a judgment , and the 2nd thing he asked for reviewing, 3rd thing Good Luck for him,you and me...

[Cassie]

Originally Posted by jon123

You have missing images and afraid for me, frames are outdated.

How can you tell they are in frames - they look like single page to me - or am I missing something?

I only ask because we use frames and are proud of it - it makes navigation so much simpler on a large site.

OK so we will never win any design awards - which is why I don't ask for a review on here - but it is easy to use which is the main thing for us.

Sorry this is a bit of a RANT because I get a bit fed up with people dissing frames all the time.

PS - we do use the NOFRAMES tag

[ouahabix]

Originally Posted by Cassie

How can you tell they are in frames - they look like single page to me - or am I missing something?

I only ask because we use frames and are proud of it - it makes navigation so much simpler on a large site.

OK so we will never win any design awards - which is why I don't ask for a review on here - but it is easy to use which is the main thing for us.

Sorry this is a bit of a RANT because I get a bit fed up with people dissing frames all the time.

PS - we do use the NOFRAMES tag

Cassie I'm really sorry if I bothered you before, and just deal with it as I said nothing.
I'm getting back my posts and hope to be good friends
Good luck man.

[jon123]

Originally Posted by Cassie

How can you tell they are in frames - they look like single page to me - or am I missing something?

I only ask because we use frames and are proud of it - it makes navigation so much simpler on a large site.

OK so we will never win any design awards - which is why I don't ask for a review on here - but it is easy to use which is the main thing for us.

Sorry this is a bit of a RANT because I get a bit fed up with people dissing frames all the time.

PS - we do use the NOFRAMES tag

Well i "diss" frames because they have never been, or shall be search engine friendly, and if you use frames to review websites like the link above, then it shows that you really shouldn't be reviewing web sites or design.

Apart from that, I have no problem with sites using frames, as long as they 'break out' of their frame window when linking to external sites. Nothing bugs me as much as someone linking to a site, especially one of mine, and because the site shows in their frames window, it looks like theirs.

To answer your q, framed sites have static areas within the pages so easy to spot, an easier way is to simply look at the source code, by right clicking.

[kev woodman]

This is just some crappy spam site. It's badly written, badly constructed and just plain bad. Why are we even discussing this spammers site?

[Cassie]

Sorry I'm not experienced enough to spot a spammer site but I do know what a framed site looks like and the link took me to a site which had no static areas - it all scrolled with the scroll bar.

I do not class myself as a reviewer or a web designer - I just happened to have designed a website - using frames - which regularly comes top of Google in relevant searches. 30% of our customers each day are new customers and the majority come from search engines.

I also know enough to allow all external links to break out.

So Jon123 - judging by your comments it is not "frames" which are bad but the "bad" designers who don't know how to use them properly.

While people continue to diss frames because of bad designers then people will continue to propagate this warped view.

You wanted "new blood" to liven up the forum - hope this is lively enought for you

[jon123]

Originally Posted by Cassie

Sorry I'm not experienced enough to spot a spammer site but I do know what a framed site looks like and the link took me to a site which had no static areas - it all scrolled with the scroll bar.

I do not class myself as a reviewer or a web designer - I just happened to have designed a website - using frames - which regularly comes top of Google in relevant searches. 30% of our customers each day are new customers and the majority come from search engines.

I also know enough to allow all external links to break out.

So Jon123 - judging by your comments it is not "frames" which are bad but the "bad" designers who don't know how to use them properly.

While people continue to diss frames because of bad designers then people will continue to propagate this warped view.

You wanted "new blood" to liven up the forum - hope this is lively enought for you

Sorry but I didn't say that you can't do well in search engine ranking using frames, but it is FACT, not my opinion which I expressed here, that search engines like google DO NOT fully support frames. It isn't heresay or rumour, it's fact.
I had a site using frames and it also did very well in search engines, and I loved the site, probably the best designed site I had created to date. I am not knocking framed sites, I said they are outdated, and I stand by that.

But that doesn't mean they shouldn't be used, or indeed that I wouldn't use them , infact I use them all the time in my login scripts for admin areas. They also are great for keeping page load times down.

What I mean by static, was that when you click between pages, you find that certain areas of the page don't always refresh when using frames, usually the navigation. Really don't want to give the spammer anymore hits, but if you have another look at the spammers site and click between the home link and the second link, you should see what I mean.
The reason the third link refreshes is usually because frames sizes have changed.

You can't beat a good debate

[kev woodman]

FWIW I was reading the frames debate and my immediate reaction was to write a devestating, yet witty, demolition of sites which use frames thereby ending all arguement about it forever (exactlt the sort of stuff I normally post obviously).

However I actually found that I couldn't find that much to criticise about frames as long as the author follows the rules (like using the noframes tag). I haven't used them for a long time but then I din't use JavaScript for a long time because it wasnt trendy enough whereas now my pages are stuffed with it.

Then again what problem does the use of frames solve and are there not better ways of achieving the same aim?

[Cassie]

I love a good debate too :p

There are two reasons which springs to mind - jon123 touched on one - load times.

The other is purely to keep the navigation and Site Name on screen all the time instead of having to scroll back up the page to find it.

Having to scroll up (or find a TOP link) was one of the things I hated when I first started looking at the Internet about 8 years ago (relative newbie). And it is still one of the things I hate most about most website - umm.... I think those floating navigation thingies that are on some site are even worse

I thought Java Script was out of favour at the moment? I use one to keep the main frame in its main set but I do have links back to the main page on all pages just in case. I also use one sometimes to add things to the shopping cart and this causes all sorts of problems - especially with AOL users.

I guess this whole debate just goes to show you can't please all of the people all of the time..... or is that fool the people

[kev woodman]

Not that long ago JS was the work of the devil but then Adaptive Path publicised AJAX and Tim O'Reilly turned his countenance upon it and saw that it was good. So now JS is state of the art... again.