My website

[Yurik]

enko.co.uk

did it all my self...
But will take advice , and might make it better!

[TimsterC]

Looks good, nice and clean. Tidy

[djpreshit]

Ahhh,

neat work there u got !!

I'g give it a 8.9/10 !!

I kinda dont like green color, but the site suits it !!

[kev woodman]

I like the green, it's the new black

Personally I wouldn't have used a serif font but it doesn't detract from the site it's just a aesthetic thing. The images are really nice and show off your work well.

One crticism I would make is the use of tables for the layout. Even if you use a WYSIWYG editor you can sometimes elect to have it create divs rather than a table. Or at least you can in Dreamweaver, which I think is the app you used for the site.

[Neoki]

Not bad at all. Looking very good. Them photos are good quality. Whats the camera you got?

[Carlos12]

Man love the site love the green love the whole layout i"ll gvie you a 10/10 cuase its so neat and orginzed and in a good way everthing matches everything love the green dont change the green imo

[Administrator]

Grass Green colour is looking perfect on your website. One of the most beautiful designs I've seen recently

[WatchOut]

i can only agree, admin

[Hammy]

In my opinion site is great too. But I think it should to add animation to links

All in all it's a nice job! Cheers!

[paul]

I like the site, and also that slogan "No job too small"

[harry]

Really a decent site
You have very good quality of images, try to organize them properly (height/width) for your inner pages.

[kev woodman]

I didn't see a problem with the images and of course you wouldn't resize them using height and width parameters, would you?

[Panarchy]

It is nice! The thing I like most about it is that it is super fast to load.

PS: It says 'Copyright © 2000-2005' maybe change that to 2000-2007? An updated copyright thing means that more people will actually look over you site.

[Pumazooma]

Originally Posted by Panarchy

It is nice! The thing I like most about it is that it is super fast to load.

PS: It says 'Copyright © 2000-2005' maybe change that to 2000-2007? An updated copyright thing means that more people will actually look over you site.

Why?
The date in a copyright represents the first publication of the work, not the current date.
I bet 99% of people never notice or even read the copyright at the bottom of web sites. I certainly don't see how it would attract more visitors for it to say 2007.

[kev woodman]

A copyright notice also isn't necessary under UK law (not sure elsewhere). It's common practice to do it but you don't have to assert your ownership of copyright, you get it automatically for being the creator of the work. So if you are going to use a copyright notice Puma's right - you may as well just use the year you first made the site public. Also you can't copyright a whole Website unless you created every element of it (including the fonts) so at best your copyright is only going to apply to the content that you explicitly created and which can't be argued to be in the public domain.

My brother works in the copyright section of the Patent Office

Does anyone know if search engines pay any attention to copyright notices?