| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | ![]() |
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
kev,
well as myspace is such a popular service, i know exactly what i would use it for if i was engineering an attack. You might know that someone in a company that you're planning on attacking uses myspace. Rather than trying to fake your way in through ringing them up at work or something, you could target them on myspace as their deffence wouldn't be so high. It's just another approach. It's like cracking message boards to get password lists. The majority of users use the same passwords that they use for message boards as well as work. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I am not talking whether it is covered in security topics or not, but I am still firm at my earlier comment, my point is that "few" people just misuse it by finding the weakest link to exploit people, I have came across with a renowned CRM company, they gathered datas and personal information of people but their few employees has misused it for their personal benifit, even though it is clearly mentioned in their TOS that they are not going to reveal it to any third party. In your case for performing penetration test can not be considered part of social engineering to gain access to your client network, as most of the client provide usually their login detail/root password and other details to get remotely access by a service providers complying to their TOS or NDA. Last edited by paul; 07-19-2006 at 04:48 PM. |
|
||||
|
So are we all agreed that by any usual definition MySpace can't be considered 'safe' although how insecure it is and why may be open to debate?
![]()
__________________
homo sum: humani nil a me alienum puto ... ( just Google it ) |
|
|||
|
Paul in my case the client doesn't know this is happening. I'm effectively cold calling an employee in that company and pretending to be someone, either within that company or a contractor. THAT is social engineering to gain accesss. All companies have the policy of not to hand out their username and passwords, even to their own IT staff, but people still do it. That's why social engineering is so effective, and why it's such a big security problem.
|
|
||||
|
Possibly that is the reason that US plan to ban social networking site, by inforcing DOPA Act, Children in the US could be banned from using social networking sites in schools and libraries by a new law; http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/5230506.stm
|
|
||||
|
They are doing this in Ireland as well but I'm not convinced that's the right way to go about it.
Firstly I'd argue that local authorities are probably the agencies that should be enforcing any ban in schools/public libraries. I'm sure that public institutions like these already operate filtering software so adding social networking sites shouldn't be a problem. Secondly I'd suspect that misuse of these sites is not taking place in libraries or schools but at home. The high profile cases of teenagers posting nude/semi-nude photographs of themselves highlight this. I'm guessing that these children didn't take the photographs on their school webcam, they did it in their bedrooms. Surely it is up to parents to ensure that they know what their children are doing on the 'net and, most importantly, that 'net enabled computers are in areas of the house where they can be monitored.
__________________
homo sum: humani nil a me alienum puto ... ( just Google it ) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|